hopefully increased fees will result in more of this...

An email I received today from my university:

During wintry conditions all staff should take extra care while driving and walking on campus.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that paths and car parks are kept clear of ice and snow, staff/students should continue to exercise caution when walking or driving on the campus even after grit/salt has been applied. In order for gritting/salting to be effective it is necessary for a degree of foot and/or vehicle traffic to take place.

Safety Tips
Here are some helpful hints from winter-safety experts that will reduce the risk of falling when slippery conditions exist:

Avoid walking in shoes that have smooth surfaces, which increase the risk of slipping.

Walk consciously. Be alert to the possibility that you could quickly slip on an unseen patch of ice. Avoid the temptation to run to catch a bus or beat traffic when crossing a street.

Walk cautiously. Your arms help keep you balanced, so keep hands out of pockets and avoid carrying heavy loads that may cause you to become off balance.

Walk "small." Look ahead of where you step. When you step on icy areas, take short, shuffling steps and walk as flatfooted as possible.

Remove snow immediately from footwear before it becomes packed or turns to ice.

Issued by the Estates Department.

Making my task too easy and doing violence to the Bible

If, however, this speculative rationalistic process of the viae in the sphere of a Christian doctrine of the Divine Attributes is forbidden to us once and for all, on the other hand a purely literalistic Bible statement is also insufficient. It consists, like all other 'biblicist' procedures, in collecting Bible passages, arranging them in some kind of order, and then summing all this up. Although this process is not so dangerous as the speculative method, yet it is very unsatisfactory, because it is so arbitrary. The Biblical statements about the Attributes of God are, however, now parts of a whole which only need to be fitted together. Such a use of the Biblical testimony contradicts the nature and intention of the testimony. The very fact that the Bible uses so much poetical, pictorial language should suffice to warn us not to follow this line of thought. In so doing the theologian both makes his own task too easy, and does violence to the Bible.

Brunner, The Christian Doctrine of God